Ed: 10.1.7.6 spelling

[Axel-Naumann]

Addressing my review comment from 2018-07-21 caused ripples in space-time:

10.1.7.6 [dcl.type.reflexpr]
"The operand to the reflexpr operator shall be" is missing all function
reflection cases:

"structured binding or data member" ->
"structured binding, data member, function parameter, captured entity,
parenthesized expression, function-call-expression or
functional-type-conv-expression"

We now have:

parenthisized expression, function call expresion or functional type conversion expression.

parenthisized and expresion are misspelled; I mean it to be the grammar terms, but if we want to spell them out the latter should probably read "type conversion expression in its functional notation".