Skip to content

Axel issues 6.2 One-definition rule [basic.def.odr] #7

@camio

Description

@camio

» AN: get_pointer references are 21.12.4.10 21.12.4.18 but should be 21.12.4.9
21.12.4.17

» AN: 6.7.1, "apply the following change:" -> "apply the following change to
paragraph 9"

» AN: 6.7.1, as the expression in a |return| statement ("return" should be
monotype)

» AN: 10.1.7.2/2: s/Add/Append/ the following row to Table 11?

» AN: 10.1.7.2/2: "The type as defined below" -> "the type as defined below"
(lower-case, matching decltype(expression))

» AN: 10.1.7.2/3: dear native English speakers, should we apply "satisfies
constraints as laid out in" -> "satisfies constraints laid out in"?

» RO: My preference is "satisfies the constraints laid out in"

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions