Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

removed statements which used sys expressions #1542

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 19, 2015

Conversation

memcmp
Copy link

@memcmp memcmp commented Jan 19, 2015

in wrong context from itests

@mfelsche
Copy link
Contributor

document the _node column in sys.shards under System Information then ack

@memcmp memcmp force-pushed the b/fix_itest_wrong_sysex branch 2 times, most recently from d75b412 to 51bf704 Compare January 19, 2015 21:09
@@ -481,6 +481,14 @@ The table schema is as follows:
| | False on non-partitioned | |
| | tables. | |
+------------------+----------------------------------+-------------+
| _node | The node the shard is located at | Object |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what about "Information about the node this shard ..." ?

@memcmp memcmp force-pushed the b/fix_itest_wrong_sysex branch 2 times, most recently from f9ee8ad to 8bcd05b Compare January 19, 2015 21:12
@mfelsche
Copy link
Contributor

ack

in wrong context from itests
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling f9ee8ad on b/fix_itest_wrong_sysex into * on relations*.

@memcmp memcmp merged commit f0960f5 into relations Jan 19, 2015
@memcmp memcmp deleted the b/fix_itest_wrong_sysex branch January 19, 2015 21:20
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling f0960f5 on b/fix_itest_wrong_sysex into * on relations*.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling f0960f5 on b/fix_itest_wrong_sysex into * on relations*.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants