Skip to content

Conversation

tpaulshippy
Copy link
Contributor

Turns out, the response body from Bedrock looks like this:

{"message":"messages.1.content: Input should be a valid list"}

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 4, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 62.50000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 92.42%. Comparing base (d3c01f1) to head (159c03c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
lib/ruby_llm/providers/bedrock.rb 62.50% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #94      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.51%   92.42%   -0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          72       72              
  Lines        2697     2705       +8     
  Branches      383      387       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits         2495     2500       +5     
- Misses        202      205       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@crmne crmne merged commit a3ea0d1 into crmne:main Apr 4, 2025
7 checks passed
@crmne
Copy link
Owner

crmne commented Apr 4, 2025

Thanks @tpaulshippy you've inspired 535c9e1

@tpaulshippy tpaulshippy deleted the bedrock-errors branch April 16, 2025 17:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants