Skip to content

Json writer: use separate compilation units for each JSON scheme #115

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 5, 2023

Conversation

kdudka
Copy link
Member

@kdudka kdudka commented Mar 4, 2023

No description provided.

This commit moves sanitizeUTF8() from writer-json.cc
to writer-json-common.cc.

Related: csutils#115
@kdudka kdudka requested a review from lzaoral March 4, 2023 11:44
@kdudka kdudka self-assigned this Mar 4, 2023
Copy link
Member

@lzaoral lzaoral left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM apart from the using namespace in a header! Details inline.

... from the writer-json module

Related: csutils#115
kdudka added a commit to kdudka/csdiff that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2023
... from the writer-json module

Related: csutils#115
kdudka added a commit to kdudka/csdiff that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2023
kdudka added a commit to kdudka/csdiff that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2023
@kdudka kdudka requested a review from lzaoral March 4, 2023 20:46
Copy link
Member

@lzaoral lzaoral left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks @kdudka! Minor nits I missed yesterday are inline.

@kdudka
Copy link
Member Author

kdudka commented Mar 5, 2023

@lzaoral Thanks for review! Merging...

@kdudka kdudka merged commit 6163c0e into csutils:main Mar 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants