Fix building with clang 8.0

[Bond-009]

No description provided.

[peterbell10]

Instead of removing the semi-colons, could you wrap the macro bodies in do {} while(false)? That way the semi-colon is required, should make the diff smaller as well.

[madmaxoft]

If there's a specific warning for the use of extra semicolons, I propose we instead turn that warning off - this diff clearly shows we don't want it.

[Bond-009]

@peterbell10 That's just a nasty hack IMO.
@madmaxoft There are also plenty of places where we don't have semicolons after the macro.

[madmaxoft]

The "nasty hack" is a pretty standard way of enforcing semicolons after macros. And I for one would very much appreciate if we did require the semicolons, so that the macros don't stand out in the code as something different from everything else.

[Bond-009]

Alright, I changed it.