Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

some question about the paper's result #1

Closed
AndyYuan96 opened this issue Mar 23, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

some question about the paper's result #1

AndyYuan96 opened this issue Mar 23, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@AndyYuan96
Copy link

Hi, thanks for sharing so great work. For the word " We also observe that it is hard to adapt detectors from the point clouds with more LiDAR beams (e.g. Waymo) to the point clouds with fewer LiDAR beams (e.g. NuScenes), while the opposite adaptation is relatively easy" in paper section 4.2, I just think the large improvement on kitti dataset is due to kitti dataset is too small, not about more lidar beams to fewer lidar beams is hard and opposite adaptation is easy, just recomand that you can give an experiment that nuscene -> waymo' result which is more convincing。

@jihanyang
Copy link
Member

jihanyang commented Mar 25, 2021

Hello, thanks for your question. Actually, you can find the results that you want in the apendix (Table S17).

@AndyYuan96
Copy link
Author

Hello, thanks for your question. Actually, you can find the results that you want in the apendix (Table S17).

sorry,I don't notice that.

jihanyang pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 22, 2021
city945 pushed a commit to city945/ST3D that referenced this issue Jan 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants