You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, thanks for sharing so great work. For the word " We also observe that it is hard to adapt detectors from the point clouds with more LiDAR beams (e.g. Waymo) to the point clouds with fewer LiDAR beams (e.g. NuScenes), while the opposite adaptation is relatively easy" in paper section 4.2, I just think the large improvement on kitti dataset is due to kitti dataset is too small, not about more lidar beams to fewer lidar beams is hard and opposite adaptation is easy, just recomand that you can give an experiment that nuscene -> waymo' result which is more convincing。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, thanks for sharing so great work. For the word " We also observe that it is hard to adapt detectors from the point clouds with more LiDAR beams (e.g. Waymo) to the point clouds with fewer LiDAR beams (e.g. NuScenes), while the opposite adaptation is relatively easy" in paper section 4.2, I just think the large improvement on kitti dataset is due to kitti dataset is too small, not about more lidar beams to fewer lidar beams is hard and opposite adaptation is easy, just recomand that you can give an experiment that nuscene -> waymo' result which is more convincing。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: