Consider signed package version

[dadhi]

Yep, consider.

[jogibear9988]

MahApps/MahApps.Metro#3029

[jogibear9988]

https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/blob/master/Documentation/project-docs/strong-name-signing.md

[dadhi]

So should I consider to sign v2.0 or leave it for now?

[jogibear9988]

I would leave it

[Japollack]

Getting back to the source of not signing it, it is now (again) recommended to sign the assambles.
Pedro Lamas: Start Strong-Naming your Assemblies!

As a final note to open-source library developers, I strongly recommend that the strong-name key file gets check-in to the project repository so that anyone can easily clone the project and compile a version of the library that works with anyone else’s binaries!

[dadhi]

Hi, Thanks for the link.
I am aware of the trend :)

Likely to sign v2.