Deserialize function for relationships

[stefanvanherwijnen]

#65

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 8193371 on stefanvanherwijnen:transform into 17b85e0 on danivek:master.

[mattiloh]

Thanks for the PR @stefanvanherwijnen! It looks like some tests are failing. Apart from that, it would be great to add a test to assert, that the deserialize function is used as expected.
Can you update this PR accordingly?

[stefanvanherwijnen]

Yep, sorry for not checking the tests...
Actually had to refactor it because I thought some neat nested ternary expression solution would be ok, but the linter did not agree with me 😅 .

[danivek]

Thanks for the PR @stefanvanherwijnen! Can you add some words about it on README, and it would be ok to merge.