Skip to content

Conversation

jdkoren
Copy link
Contributor

@jdkoren jdkoren commented Dec 18, 2019

(on top of #2098 - compare here)

Moved options that configure the generator to generator.dart. These can be used by more than one generator in the future.

@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes Google CLA check succeeded. label Dec 18, 2019
@jcollins-g
Copy link
Contributor

I'll take a second look once the base lands. My main concern here is it seems like a lot of parameters, while they theoretically could apply to different generators, will change radically in behavior (for example, the templates directory I assume might not contain HTML?).

It's probably fine for now, but it'll be necessary to clarify this more once we actually have different generators.

@jdkoren
Copy link
Contributor Author

jdkoren commented Jan 2, 2020

Yeah, it might not actually be necessary/worthwhile to split base vs html generator options. I'll ponder this a little more.

@jdkoren jdkoren force-pushed the generator_context branch from 9ae5bce to 4f27b8f Compare January 3, 2020 23:02
@jdkoren jdkoren changed the title Split up base generator options from html ones Move generator options into generator.dart Jan 3, 2020
@jdkoren
Copy link
Contributor Author

jdkoren commented Jan 3, 2020

Recombined the base and html options into one GeneratorContext, so this mostly amounts to moving some stuff from html_generator.dart to generator.dart.

@jdkoren jdkoren force-pushed the generator_context branch from 4f27b8f to 17e6db2 Compare January 7, 2020 15:47
@jdkoren jdkoren merged commit fc3fe59 into dart-lang:master Jan 7, 2020
@jdkoren jdkoren deleted the generator_context branch January 7, 2020 21:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla: yes Google CLA check succeeded.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants