Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[v19.x] chore: backport v18.2.2 into v19.x properly #5315

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Apr 14, 2023

Conversation

PastaPastaPasta
Copy link
Member

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta commented Apr 14, 2023

We did this previously, but due to it being in a PR that also merged other things, it ended up being merged as a squash commit, when it should be merged via merge commit. This PR resolves that with no-diff. This will allow us to ff master to the v19.x branch. This PR has no diff, only does some git stuff.

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

For repository code-owners and collaborators only

  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

ogabrielides and others added 7 commits March 14, 2023 20:15
- Added new LLMQ type `llmq_25_67`
- The above LLMQ is added only for Testnet and it is activated with v19
fork.

- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

---------

Co-authored-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
…lts accordingly (dashpay#5247)

This allows us to have a bit more granular control over GetLLMQ results,
removes code duplication and also optimises things a tiny bit by
replacing "HasLLMQ + GetLLMQParams" calls with simply "GetLLMQParams".

Use `optional` in `GetLLMQ`, drop `HasLLMQ`.

run tests, reindex on testnet/mainnet

n/a

- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
[v18.2.x] backport: backports and version bump to 18.2.2
@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta added this to the 19 milestone Apr 14, 2023
Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

LGTM, utACK

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 merged commit b66dc27 into dashpay:v19.x Apr 14, 2023
@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta deleted the v19.x-fix-ff-only branch April 17, 2023 03:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants