Skip to content

Conversation

MarcoGorelli
Copy link
Contributor

@MarcoGorelli MarcoGorelli commented Aug 30, 2023

Similar to #245

In for a penny, in for a pound - if we're gonna make breaking changes whilst we're still in "beta", I suggest we go all the way there

Areg had said that it would be nice to get to the point of making this user-friendly, and names like get_columns_by_name and get_rows_by_mask aren't really going to cut it

why filter? Because it's already there in:

  • pyspark
  • polars
  • dplyr (R)

@MarcoGorelli
Copy link
Contributor Author

this was verbally approved in the last call

if there's no objections, will merge later this week

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants