the project fork from https://github.com/softdevteam/grmtools/tree/master/lrpar
lrpar
provides a Yacc-compatible parser (where grammars can be generated at
compile-time or run-time). It can take in traditional .y
files and convert
them into an idiomatic Rust parser.
If you're new to lrpar
, please read the "quick start guide". The "grmtools
book" and API reference have more detailed information. You can find the
appropriate documentation for the version of lrpar you are using here:
Latest release | master |
---|---|
Quickstart guide | Quickstart guide |
grmtools book | grmtools book |
lrpar API | lrpar API |
Documentation for all past and present releases
Let's assume we want to statically generate a parser for a simple calculator
language (and let's also assume we are able to use
lrlex
for the
lexer). We need to add a build.rs
file to our project which statically
compiles both the lexer and parser. While we can perform both steps
individually, it's easiest to use lrlex
which does both jobs for us in one
go. Our build.rs
file thus looks as follows:
use cfgrammar::yacc::YaccKind;
use lrlex::CTLexerBuilder;
fn main() -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
CTLexerBuilder::new()
.lrpar_config(|ctp| {
ctp.yacckind(YaccKind::Grmtools)
.grammar_in_src_dir("calc.y")
.unwrap()
})
.lexer_in_src_dir("calc.l")?
.build()?;
Ok(())
}
where src/calc.l
is as follows:
%%
[0-9]+ "INT"
\+ "+"
\* "*"
\( "("
\) ")"
[\t ]+ ;
and src/calc.y
is as follows:
%start Expr
%avoid_insert "INT"
%%
Expr -> Result<u64, ()>:
Expr '+' Term { Ok($1? + $3?) }
| Term { $1 }
;
Term -> Result<u64, ()>:
Term '*' Factor { Ok($1? * $3?) }
| Factor { $1 }
;
Factor -> Result<u64, ()>:
'(' Expr ')' { $2 }
| 'INT'
{
let v = $1.map_err(|_| ())?;
parse_int($lexer.span_str(v.span()))
}
;
%%
// Any functions here are in scope for all the grammar actions above.
fn parse_int(s: &str) -> Result<u64, ()> {
match s.parse::<u64>() {
Ok(val) => Ok(val),
Err(_) => {
eprintln!("{} cannot be represented as a u64", s);
Err(())
}
}
}
Because we specified that our Yacc file is in Grmtools
format, each rule has a
separate Rust type to which all its functions conform (in this case, all the
rules have the same type, but that's not a requirement).
A simple src/main.rs
is as follows:
use std::io::{self, BufRead, Write};
use lrlex::lrlex_mod;
use lrpar::lrpar_mod;
// Using `lrlex_mod!` brings the lexer for `calc.l` into scope.
lrlex_mod!("calc.l");
// Using `lrpar_mod!` brings the parser for `calc.y` into scope.
lrpar_mod!("calc.y");
fn main() {
// Get the `LexerDef` for the `calc` language.
let lexerdef = calc_l::lexerdef();
let stdin = io::stdin();
loop {
print!(">>> ");
io::stdout().flush().ok();
match stdin.lock().lines().next() {
Some(Ok(ref l)) => {
if l.trim().is_empty() {
continue;
}
// Now we create a lexer with the `lexer` method with which
// we can lex an input.
let lexer = lexerdef.lexer(l);
// Pass the lexer to the parser and lex and parse the input.
let (res, errs) = calc_y::parse(&lexer);
for e in errs {
println!("{}", e.pp(&lexer, &calc_y::token_epp));
}
match res {
Some(Ok(r)) => println!("Result: {}", r),
_ => eprintln!("Unable to evaluate expression.")
}
}
_ => break
}
}
}
We can now cargo run
our project and evaluate simple expressions:
>>> 2 + 3
Result: 5
>>> 2 + 3 * 4
Result: 14
>>> (2 + 3) * 4
Result: 20
lrpar
also comes with advanced error
recovery built-in:
>>> 2 + + 3
Parsing error at line 1 column 5. Repair sequences found:
1: Delete +
2: Insert INT
Result: 5
>>> 2 + 3 3
Parsing error at line 1 column 7. Repair sequences found:
1: Insert *
2: Insert +
3: Delete 3
Result: 11
>>> 2 + 3 4 5
Parsing error at line 1 column 7. Repair sequences found:
1: Insert *, Delete 4
2: Insert +, Delete 4
3: Delete 4, Delete 5
4: Insert +, Shift 4, Delete 5
5: Insert +, Shift 4, Insert +
6: Insert *, Shift 4, Delete 5
7: Insert *, Shift 4, Insert *
8: Insert *, Shift 4, Insert +
9: Insert +, Shift 4, Insert *
Result: 17