Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Renaming is_primary to default_agg_time #58

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

callum-mcdata
Copy link
Contributor

@callum-mcdata callum-mcdata commented May 17, 2023

resolves #49

Description

This is a draft PR. I'm not in love with the name default_agg_time 🤔

Checklist

@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla:yes label May 17, 2023
@dbt-labs dbt-labs deleted a comment from github-actions bot May 17, 2023
@QMalcolm QMalcolm changed the base branch from protocolization-branch to main May 20, 2023 00:03
@QMalcolm
Copy link
Collaborator

I'll clean up this PR's history on Monday

@QMalcolm QMalcolm force-pushed the renaming-is-primary-to-default-agg-time branch from 0316a90 to 875d433 Compare May 22, 2023 17:45
@QMalcolm QMalcolm requested review from tlento and Jstein77 May 22, 2023 17:46
@QMalcolm QMalcolm marked this pull request as ready for review May 22, 2023 17:46
@QMalcolm
Copy link
Collaborator

@tlento I assume we're still good with this rename. @Jstein77, wanted to make sure you're aware of this.

Copy link
Collaborator

@tlento tlento left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I never liked agg_time_dimension, and so I don't like default_agg_time either (and honestly I think this should be default_agg_time_dimension if we do stick with this nomenclature).

That said, I have no better suggestions. I do think the default marker should have the same name. It might be worth a one-shot brainstorm on better names for the overall construct.

I'm not approving this just yet because @plypaul also had some idea about a default settings construct, so we should probably spend a few minutes making sure we don't want to go in that direction just yet.

@QMalcolm
Copy link
Collaborator

Closed in favor of #50

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Spec Update] Rename is_primary to default_agg_time
4 participants