Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

simpler solution to the configuration problem #611

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2020
Merged

Conversation

ineiti
Copy link
Member

@ineiti ineiti commented Jan 15, 2020

Closes #610

This is a much simpler version than #609. Instead of sending two messages serially, which can get two different connections, it extends the signature of Router.Send to a variadic number of messages to send.

-> Backwards compatible
-> passes test

@ineiti ineiti self-assigned this Jan 15, 2020
@ineiti ineiti force-pushed the config_error_simple branch 3 times, most recently from 742b754 to 0e7d35e Compare January 15, 2020 16:50
@jeffallen jeffallen merged commit f0a878c into master Jan 24, 2020
@jeffallen jeffallen deleted the config_error_simple branch January 24, 2020 13:25
mickmis added a commit to ldsec/medco-unlynx that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2020
mickmis added a commit to ldsec/medco that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Protocol-configuration is sometimes lost
2 participants