Repository navigation
Replies: 1 comment
|
可选修复方案 方案 B:重复检测加完整资源预算,推荐 推荐方案 验收标准
如果维护者认可,我愿意按方案 B 提交 PR,包括 Cursor 环检测、可配置资源预算、旧 Generation 保留和完整边界测试。 |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
证据:
假 MCP:
let calls = 0 const client = { request: async () => { calls++ return { tools: [], nextCursor: 'same' } }, }syncTools() 会持续请求同一个 cursor,既不返回也不报错。持续活动还可能绕过单次空闲超时。
设计建议:
验收标准:
All reactions