TAT-7: Alignment Analysis with v2.4 (Reference Only)

[maratsultanov2]

📌 TAT-7: Alignment Analysis and Architectural Boundaries

Status: Reference Only (Final)
Author: Marat Sultanov (maratsultanov2)
Date: 15 April 2026
Repository: https://github.com/maratsultanov2/TAT-7

---

📄 Full Document

The complete analysis is available as a Gist:

🔗 https://gist.github.com/maratsultanov2/f886f0f3a4570db7a940f97301e2a5da

---

🎯 Key Points

1. TAT-7 is independent research — not part of v2.4 codebase
2. v2.4 exceeds TAT-7 in compliance (on-device, hardware identity, zone access)
3. TAT-7 and v2.4 are complementary but incompatible (cloud vs on-device)

---

📊 Comparison Table

Parameter	TAT-7	v2.4
Storage	Cloud (Google Drive)	100% on-device
Identity	Software tokens	Hardware (eFUSE + ML-DSA-87)
Zone Access	None	user_zone, mother_zone, shared_zone
Adaptivity	1/3/5/7 heads	Fixed

---

🔗 References

• TAT-7 Repository: https://github.com/maratsultanov2/TAT-7
• Original Issue: Feature Request: On-Device Persistent Memory with Cryptographic Identity Binding (Local Storage Architecture) deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3#1121

---

This document is licensed under CC BY 4.0

[qingkong66]

Hi @maratsultanov2,

Thank you for setting up the Discussion and sharing the Gist link. This is exactly the right place for it.

I've read through the document. The analysis is clear, well-structured, and respects the architectural boundaries we discussed. It's a valuable reference for anyone interested in the intersection of persistent memory and regulatory compliance.

Thank you again for your thoughtful contribution.

[qingkong66]

Dear @maratsultanov2

Thank you for posting this. The summary is very clear, and having the full document on Gist as a permanent reference is a good approach.

The analysis is well-structured and does exactly what we discussed: it highlights where v2.4 excels in compliance (on-device, hardware identity, zone access), while clearly marking TAT-7 as an independent research path.

This is a valuable reference for the community, especially for anyone thinking about the trade-offs between cloud and on-device architectures for persistent memory.

Thank you again for your thoughtful and well-executed contribution.

qingkong66