Improve test descriptions for clarity in test names #25
Conversation
…re validation tests
WalkthroughTest files under test/utils were updated primarily to reword and clarify test descriptions. validation.test.ts also refines expectations and expands coverage scenarios without changing implementation or public APIs. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
test/utils/validation.test.ts (1)
26-38: Mismatch risk: “Missing required fields” assertion too rigid.
Each fixture omits a different field, but the test expects an error listing all three. Either compute the exact missing set per case or assert more flexibly.Apply this refactor to assert per case:
- incompleteInputs.forEach(input => { - const result = validateWalletAuthInput(input); - expect(result.isValid).toBe(false); - expect(result.error).toBe('Missing required fields: walletAddress, message, signature'); - }); + const cases = [ + { input: { message: 'test', signature: '0x' + '1'.repeat(130) }, missing: 'walletAddress' }, + { input: { walletAddress: '0xf39Fd6e51aad88F6F4ce6aB8827279cffFb92266', signature: '0x' + '1'.repeat(130) }, missing: 'message' }, + { input: { walletAddress: '0xf39Fd6e51aad88F6F4ce6aB8827279cffFb92266', message: 'test' }, missing: 'signature' }, + ]; + cases.forEach(({ input, missing }) => { + const result = validateWalletAuthInput(input as any); + expect(result.isValid).toBe(false); + expect(result.error).toMatch(new RegExp(`Missing required fields:.*\\b${missing}\\b`)); + });
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
test/utils/ethereumAddress.test.ts (1)
75-97: Remove noisy console logging from tests.
console.log in the invalid-address test adds noise to CI output; prefer assertions only.Apply this diff:
- const result = isValidEthereumAddress(address); - console.log(`Address: ${address}, Result: ${result}`); - expect(result).toBe(false); + expect(isValidEthereumAddress(address)).toBe(false);test/utils/verifySignature.test.ts (1)
137-157: Fix misleading inline comment about “well‑known/Vitalik” address.
The test uses a local dev private key, not a public celebrity address. Update the comment to avoid confusion.- // Test with a well-known Ethereum address (Vitalik's public address) + // Test with a deterministic local test wallet address (Hardhat default)test/utils/validation.test.ts (1)
119-129: Export and reuse MAX_MESSAGE_LENGTH (avoid magic 1000 in tests)src/utils/validation.ts currently hardcodes 1000 and the error text while the test hardcodes 1001 — export a constant (e.g. export const MAX_MESSAGE_LENGTH = 1000) from src/utils/validation.ts and import it in test/utils/validation.test.ts (use MAX_MESSAGE_LENGTH + 1 for the exceeding case). Optionally derive the "Message too long (max ...)" string from that constant to keep messages in sync.
Locations: src/utils/validation.ts (message-length check) and test/utils/validation.test.ts (lines 119–129).
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
test/utils/ethereumAddress.test.ts(6 hunks)test/utils/generateApiKey.test.ts(17 hunks)test/utils/messageFormat.test.ts(7 hunks)test/utils/validation.test.ts(16 hunks)test/utils/verifySignature.test.ts(10 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
test/utils/validation.test.ts (1)
src/utils/validation.ts (1)
validateSignatureFormat(102-105)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
test/utils/generateApiKey.test.ts (1)
20-20: LGTM on clearer test names; behavior unchanged.
Titles now read as explicit expectations and improve readability without altering assertions.Also applies to: 29-29, 38-38, 48-48, 69-69, 82-82, 93-93, 107-107, 117-117, 128-128, 140-140, 153-153, 172-172, 190-190, 211-211, 226-226, 237-237
test/utils/ethereumAddress.test.ts (1)
14-26: Descriptions improved; assertions intact.
No functional deltas detected in these suites.Also applies to: 29-49, 55-72, 104-116, 123-143
test/utils/messageFormat.test.ts (1)
9-29: Clearer names; keep “current implementation” notes intentional.
Descriptions explicitly document present acceptance of control chars/XSS/SQLi. Confirm this is deliberately tested current behavior, not desired long‑term policy.Would you like follow‑up TODOs or pending tests that assert rejection once validation is tightened?
Also applies to: 30-55, 58-76, 77-95, 96-114, 117-139, 140-162
test/utils/verifySignature.test.ts (1)
27-42: Good renaming; expectations unchanged.
Test intent is clearer across basic and timestamped verification.Also applies to: 48-78, 84-131, 163-191, 201-228, 234-251, 257-276, 282-301, 311-335
test/utils/validation.test.ts (2)
6-16: Broadly OK; assertions read clearer.
Most description changes are nits-only with unchanged logic.Also applies to: 17-25, 40-52, 54-75, 76-98, 99-118, 119-129, 130-141, 143-153, 154-164, 165-175, 176-188, 190-195, 196-211, 214-224, 226-240
130-141: Validator permits extra keys — no change required.
validateWalletAuthInput only checks presence/types/formats of walletAddress, message, and signature and does not reject unknown object keys (see src/utils/validation.ts), so the test asserting permissive validation is correct.
All test files in
tests/utilsnow have more descriptive and explicit test names. This improves clarity and makes it easier to understand what each test is verifying, especially when reading test output or debugging failures.Summary by CodeRabbit