You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What's your opinion ? I could produce the doc text for the Boeotian like me if you wish, if I can understand the implication of each parameters on the result.
for example, I don't get the "Controls the bias toward clipping along revolution planes.". Maybe I am not the only one.
So for the current doc, it would state: range [A,B], "with A meaning X and B meaning Y" on the resulting mesh. Nothing more.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
I think the doc is lacking a note on the parameters to use for better representation of the underlying mesh.
The original project has it but the issue is that the parameters are not the same between the two projects.
Even the commented link in the source code doesn't make it clear, because the range don't seem to be the same/given.
What's your opinion ? I could produce the doc text for the Boeotian like me if you wish, if I can understand the implication of each parameters on the result.
for example, I don't get the "Controls the bias toward clipping along revolution planes.". Maybe I am not the only one.
So for the current doc, it would state: range [A,B], "with A meaning X and B meaning Y" on the resulting mesh. Nothing more.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: