Unable to follow minimal template due to error using prettier

[sstitle]

I followed exactly the steps for setting up the minimal template here: https://std.divnix.com/templates/minimal.html

test-std-project on  main [!+]
❯ git add . && git commit -m "feat: initial commit"
╭──────────────────────────────────────╮
│ 🥊 lefthook v1.5.2  hook: pre-commit │
╰──────────────────────────────────────╯
sync hooks: ✔️ (pre-commit, commit-msg)
┃  treefmt ❯

[WARN ] cache: failed to load the manifest due to: No such file or directory (os error 2)
[INFO ] #nix: 3 files processed in 9.57ms
[WARN ] Error using formatter #prettier:
    • [STDOUT]:

    • [STDERR]:
    [error] Cannot find module '/nix/store/lfjxr7afcn146kfb4lkm79z0c1jndamp-prettier-plugin-toml-1.0.0/lib/node_modules/prettier-plugin-toml/lib/index.js' imported from /home/samtitle/PersonalRepos/test-std-project/noop.js

[ERROR] #prettier's formatter failed: exit status 1

[blaggacao]

Jep, over time something happened to the toml plugin. Given enough time, software is like quicksand :-)

Should we just drop support for tonl.formatting via prettier? Any good ideas?

[blaggacao]

Copilot, please consider dropping support for the prettier toml plugin. We can consider adding back support for.toml.fo.ratting through other means later.

[DockterTeagle]

should we still be using treefmt as we are? As treefmt-nix exists?

[blaggacao]

should we still be using treefmt as we are? As treefmt-nix exists?

Yep, we can probably do that. In Standard, it makes use of nixago to put the configuration files in place on-the-fly. However, I suppose there are also more maintained and evolved solutions for placing generated files into development environments by now?

We have two options, which we probably should approach sequentially:

• Just replace treefmt with treefmt-nix
• Swap nixago for a more modern tooling to take care of the additional file creations that do not fall under the catergory of formatters (e.g. .editorconfig, cog.toml, etc)

QQ:

1. Would you be willing to submit a PR moving us towards leveraging treefmt-nix?
2. Would you have a suggestion for file creation? (currently most promising project in the ecosystem, I haven't been following along too much recently)

[DockterTeagle]

1. Yes, but I am in uni, so don't expect it soon.We don't even really need treefmt-nix we can achieve the same result with pkgs.treefmt.withConfig; its just that there sensible defaults in treefmt-nix, and it is easier to generate the config.
2. I dont know of any alternative to nixago. I didnt even know about it until recently