refactor: 💡 type section is redundant and not formatted #1327
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When an object is flow typed, a `type` AND `properties` section is rendered. The type section seems redundant and isn't formatted, whereas the properties section is. This PR removes the `type` section when dealing with an object type. ✅ Closes: documentationjs#1326
tmcw
approved these changes
Jun 4, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When an object is flow typed, a
typeANDpropertiessection isrendered. The type section seems redundant and isn't formatted, whereas
the properties section is. This PR removes the
typesection whendealing with an object type.
✅ Closes: #1326