-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Different power spectrum results given same sb model #23
Comments
Hi @ktrehaeven . I need to look into the power spectrum part but in any case it seems obvious from your plots that you have an issue with the background subtraction, which may be responsible for the differences that you find. I suspect that you may have subtracted the sky backkground multiple times from the same surface brightness profile, which resulted in over-subtraction. The point is, please check your background subtraction first and find an appropriate fit to the surface brightness, otherwise the 2D model will be wrong and you will end up with different power spectra. |
Thank you very much for the guidance. I re-fitted after the subtraction and
much of the variation has disappeared and the amplitude and power spectrum
plots more or less seem to be consistent. Thanks!
Kind regards
Keegan Trehaeven
…On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 8:22 AM Dominique Eckert ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi @ktrehaeven <https://github.com/ktrehaeven> . I need to look into the
power spectrum part but in any case it seems obvious from your plots that
you have an issue with the background subtraction, which may be responsible
for the differences that you find. I suspect that you may have subtracted
the sky backkground multiple times from the same surface brightness
profile, which resulted in over-subtraction.
The point is, please check your background subtraction first and find an
appropriate fit to the surface brightness, otherwise the 2D model will be
wrong and you will end up with different power spectra.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#23 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ASRMRFA53IYAZ5343UFJKJLXRIN2FANCNFSM6AAAAAA2OSWGYI>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Hi
I'm trying to get the power spectrum (ps) of surface brightness (sb) residuals for a cool-core galaxy cluster. However, identical runs of the ps analysis gives different results. I've been using a double beta model. I've attached a screenshot of the parameters that the sb fitting converges to, as well as the ps and amplitude plots from identical runs using these same model parameters. Sometimes the variation is within the calculated uncertainties, sometimes not. I'm not sure if this is a matter of SNR or if something deeper is responsible. The obs is > 100 ks but I'm using a binsize of 1.476 arcsec (3 chandra pixels) to determine the profile.
power_spectrum.inner_200kpc_radius1.pdf
power_spectrum.inner_200kpc_radius2.pdf
a2d.inner_200kpc_radius1.pdf
a2d.inner_200kpc_radius2.pdf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: