Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modify the windows amd64 unwinder to work as jitted code unwinder on Uni... #259

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 13, 2015

Conversation

@janvorli
Copy link
Member

@janvorli janvorli commented Feb 13, 2015

Update the windows amd64 unwinder from its source to the latest version
and add context pointers updating that was excluded before.
Change methods of the OOPStackUnwinder and OOPStackUnwinderAMD64 to be
static, since the base class has no data members and the unwinding is
always using the processor specific subclass.
Modify the code so that it is built in two flavors. The first one
is the DAC flavor which is used by the debugger. The second one will be
used for jitted code stack frames unwinding on non-Windows systems.

…Unix

Update the windows amd64 unwinder from its source to the latest version
and add context pointers updating that was excluded before.
Change methods of the OOPStackUnwinder and OOPStackUnwinderAMD64 to be
static, since the base class has no data members and the unwinding is
always using the processor specific subclass.
Modify the code so that it is built in two flavors. The first one
is the DAC flavor which is used by the debugger. The second one will be
used for jitted code stack frames unwinding on non-Windows systems.
@janvorli
Copy link
Member Author

@janvorli janvorli commented Feb 13, 2015

Represents part of #177

Loading

@jkotas
Copy link
Member

@jkotas jkotas commented Feb 13, 2015

LGTM

Loading

janvorli added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 13, 2015
Modify the windows amd64 unwinder to work as jitted code unwinder on Uni...
@janvorli janvorli merged commit 0e20a9e into dotnet:master Feb 13, 2015
1 check passed
Loading
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants