-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
Fix an error in the output comment #10325
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Learn Build status updates of commit 76fa54e: ✅ Validation status: passed
For more details, please refer to the build report. For any questions, please:
|
Hi @salpelter I'm closing this because the original code is correct. The declaration casts the type of |
I don't understand what you're trying to say, to be honest. I never said that the number isn't of type I followed your sharplab link and it only confirmed that I was right. It literally displayed "10653 is a 64-bit integer," as I expected. Am I missing something? It didn't even cross my mind at the time of making the pull request that my edit was in any way incorrect. Could you please explain what's wrong? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you @salpelter!
Learn Build status updates of commit 76fa54e: ✅ Validation status: passed
For more details, please refer to the build report. For any questions, please:
|
Summary
It's basically a code example that has a wrong output comment in the end. The number in question (10653) is actually of type
long
, which makes it asigned 64-bit integer
, not 32.