Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test Failure: JIT/jit64/opt/cg/cgstress/CgStress1_ro/CgStress1_ro.cmd #110176

Closed
WangyangZhou90 opened this issue Nov 26, 2024 · 11 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
Milestone

Comments

@WangyangZhou90
Copy link
Contributor

Failed in:runtime-cet 20240925.1
Error message:

C:\h\w\AB0609D4\w\B16009B0\e\JIT\jit64\jit64_3../opt/cg/cgstress/CgStress1_r/CgStress1_r.cmd
04:12:45.420 Passed test: JIT/jit64/opt/cg/cgstress/CgStress1_r/CgStress1_r.cmd
04:12:45.421 Running test: JIT/jit64/opt/cg/cgstress/CgStress1_ro/CgStress1_ro.cmd

Assert failure(PID 3384 [0x00000d38], Thread: 3696 [0x0e70]): !"If this ever fires, then this method should return HRESULT"

CORECLR! FieldDesc::GetAttributes + 0xFA (0x00007ffcbb62552a) CORECLR! CEEInfo::getFieldInfo + 0x577 (0x00007ffcbb63ef97)
CLRJIT! Compiler::impImportBlockCode + 0x6212 (0x00007ffcbc5caa02) CLRJIT! Compiler::impImportBlock + 0x1AD (0x00007ffcbc5c370d)
CLRJIT! Compiler::impImport + 0x48E (0x00007ffcbc5c2b1e) CLRJIT! Compiler::fgImport + 0x18 (0x00007ffcbc55e848)
CLRJIT! Phase::Run + 0x76 (0x00007ffcbc6bf3a6) CLRJIT! Compiler::compCompile + 0x21F (0x00007ffcbc4e7f1f)
CLRJIT! Compiler::compCompileHelper + 0xA2A (0x00007ffcbc4ebd4a) CLRJIT! Compiler::compCompile + 0x948 (0x00007ffcbc4eab18)
File: D:\a_work\1\s\src\coreclr\vm\field.h:632
Image: C:\h\w\AB0609D4\p\corerun.exe

App Exit Code: -1073740286
Expected: 100
Actual: -1073740286
END EXECUTION - FAILED
FAILED
FAILED
[XUnitLogChecker]: 04:12:47.58: The full run will be done.
[XUnitLogChecker]: 04:12:47.59: Item 'jit64_3' did not finish running. Checking and fixing the log...
[XUnitLogChecker]: 04:12:47.59: XUnit log file has been fixed!

@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Nov 26, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot added the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label Nov 26, 2024
@JulieLeeMSFT JulieLeeMSFT added area-VM-coreclr and removed area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI labels Nov 26, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @mangod9
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@mrsharm
Copy link
Member

mrsharm commented Nov 26, 2024

Unassigning the GC team since this seems like a JIT based assertion failure that occurred while running the CET test suite.

CC: @JulieLeeMSFT

@mangod9 mangod9 added area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI and removed area-VM-coreclr labels Nov 26, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@mangod9
Copy link
Member

mangod9 commented Nov 26, 2024

Oh, I noticed Julie had moved it to VM area. Was this investigated and determined to be not an issue in codegen?

@amanasifkhalid
Copy link
Member

Was this investigated and determined to be not an issue in codegen?

As far as I know, nobody on the codegen side has investigated this yet. cc @dotnet/jit-contrib

@EgorBo
Copy link
Member

EgorBo commented Nov 27, 2024

Was this investigated and determined to be not an issue in codegen?

The assert was failing on VM side, that is why it was moved to VM I guess.

@amanasifkhalid
Copy link
Member

I cannot reproduce this issue with a mainline build, or with the build from the failing run. The latest run of runtime-cet passed, so maybe this was a one-off?

@JulieLeeMSFT
Copy link
Member

The assert was failing on VM side, that is why it was moved to VM I guess.

That is right.

I cannot reproduce this issue with a mainline build, or with the build from the failing run. The latest run of runtime-cet passed, so maybe this was a one-off?

Let's monitor some more runs and close this issue if it doesn't happen again.

@JulieLeeMSFT JulieLeeMSFT added this to the 10.0.0 milestone Nov 27, 2024
@amanasifkhalid
Copy link
Member

Let's monitor some more runs and close this issue if it doesn't happen again.

Assigning myself so I remember to check.

@amanasifkhalid amanasifkhalid self-assigned this Nov 28, 2024
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot removed the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label Nov 28, 2024
@amanasifkhalid
Copy link
Member

Let's monitor some more runs and close this issue if it doesn't happen again.

This hasn't reproduced for the last two runs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants