-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FBA gives incorrect objective_value 0 for bigg models iMM1415 & iRC1080 #1
Comments
@matthiaskoenig, These models now provide correct results in SBSCL. I have updated the changes in PR #54. So, should I link this issue to the PR so that it can be closed once PR gets merged? |
OPTIMAL LP SOLUTION FOUND OPTIMAL LP SOLUTION FOUND |
Yes, link the issue.
…On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 6:48 PM Hemil Panchiwala ***@***.***> wrote:
OPTIMAL LP SOLUTION FOUND
iMM1415.xml
Objective value: 1.3634279056663554
OPTIMAL LP SOLUTION FOUND
iRC1080.xml
Objective value: 6.156851475933738
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAG33OUW2L7FES7CD2BW4HDR7QV7JANCNFSM4FANYDVA>
.
--
Matthias König, PhD.
Junior Group Leader LiSyM - Systems Medicine of the Liver
Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Biology, Institute for
Theoretical Biology
https://livermetabolism.com
konigmatt@googlemail.com
https://twitter.com/konigmatt
https://github.com/matthiaskoenig
Tel: +49 30 2093 98435
|
@hemilpanchiwala: It would be helpful to also state which software found which value and how large the divergence was. Which solver was used? |
These are the results provided by SBSCL. While the results by cobrapy are
Deviations (sbscl_results - cobrapy_results):
|
I used the FluxBalanceAnalysis class to solve the model. |
The divergence is only only the order of or even . This is already getting close to machine precision for some circumstances. |
When comparing the results of simple FBA simulations of cobrapy with SBSCL the following two BiGG models give different results:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: