Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{bio}[dummy] Picard 1.119 (REVIEW) #1269

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 12, 2015
Merged

Conversation

pescobar
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Contributor

Test PASSed.

@fgeorgatos
Copy link
Contributor

Test report by @fgeorgatos
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1
Linux debian 6.0.10, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5640 @ 2.27GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/cfa1da6701db70b6c43c for a full test report.

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Contributor

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/2321/
Test FAILed.

@boegel boegel changed the title latest picard easyconfig {bio}[dummy] Picard 1.119 (REVIEW) Feb 12, 2015
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Feb 12, 2015

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.6, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/4ac80d631052a0f18c7c for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Feb 12, 2015

Jenkins: test this please

@hpcugentbot
Copy link
Contributor

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/2323/
Test PASSed.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Feb 12, 2015

going in, thanks @pescobar!

boegel added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2015
{bio}[dummy] Picard 1.119 (REVIEW)
@boegel boegel merged commit 30308fc into easybuilders:develop Feb 12, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants