-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tests failing in random order (again) #757
Comments
I use the same script and the same seed but I don't have the same file order. For example, here:
So I can't reproduce all of these failures |
Hmm, maybe because you are on Windows, and we run the check on Ubuntu for our CI/CD. On macOS, I can reproduce two failures. I have changed the workflow so that the tests run on Windows. Let's see if we still see any test failures. |
Yeah, failures are also seen on Windows: https://github.com/easystats/insight/actions/runs/4697252164/jobs/8328125120 Note that the seed is going to be different for each run. |
The problem is not due to this, it's that before running the tests I can't get the same order as you even if I use exactly the same seed (and I don't know why) |
I see this warning:
|
It's not a warning, it's just a skip message. It's because of namespace conflict, cf https://stackoverflow.com/questions/72533745/loading-logistf-breaks-mcmcglmm/72536046 I made a PR upstream but no answer so far georgheinze/logistf#54 |
* Tests failing in random order (again) Fixes #757 * fix * fix * fix styling --------- Co-authored-by: Indrajeet Patil <patilindrajeet.science@gmail.com>
@etiennebacher Do you want to have a look at it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: