-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
fix n+1 api-requests on admin/checklist #7641
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix n+1 api-requests on admin/checklist #7641
Conversation
⛔ Feature branch deployment currently inactive.If the PR is still open, you can add the |
@CodeRabbit review this pr |
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chainI'll help you review this PR! Let me gather the necessary information about the changes first. 🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 3150 @BacLuc Here's my review of PR #7641: ✅ Overall Assessment: Good Performance FixThis PR effectively addresses the N+1 API request problem by refactoring the Strengths:
Areas for Enhancement:
async handler(checklistItem) {
try {
await this.camp.activities()._meta.load
// ... rest of the logic
this.activitiesWithChecklistItem = res
} catch (error) {
console.error('Error loading activities with checklist item:', error)
this.activitiesWithChecklistItem = []
}
}
data() {
return {
entityProperties: ['checklist', 'text'],
entityUri: '',
activitiesWithChecklistItem: [],
isLoadingActivities: false,
}
}
async handler(checklistItem) {
const requestId = Date.now()
this.currentRequestId = requestId
// ... async operations ...
if (this.currentRequestId === requestId) {
this.activitiesWithChecklistItem = res
}
} Technical Notes:
Conclusion:This is a solid performance optimization that should significantly reduce API calls. The core implementation is sound, and the suggested enhancements would make it more robust for production use. Recommendation: ✅ Approve with optional improvements for error handling and loading states. |
353334d
to
5c56a59
Compare
5c56a59
to
1c07342
Compare
1c07342
to
36f69fe
Compare
36f69fe
to
c135a0f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approved by @pmattmann
resolves #7635