Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

connector client: switch ContractNegotiationService #56

Closed
Tracked by #38
ndr-brt opened this issue Aug 24, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed
Tracked by #38

connector client: switch ContractNegotiationService #56

ndr-brt opened this issue Aug 24, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@ndr-brt
Copy link
Member

ndr-brt commented Aug 24, 2023

Feature Request

Use the EDC-connector-client in the ContractNegotiationService

Which Areas Would Be Affected?

e.g., DPF, CI, build, transfer, etc.

Why Is the Feature Desired?

Are there any requirements?

Solution Proposal

If possible, provide a (brief!) solution proposal.

@janpmeyer janpmeyer self-assigned this Sep 15, 2023
janpmeyer added a commit to FraunhoferISST/edc-dashboard that referenced this issue Oct 20, 2023
janpmeyer added a commit to FraunhoferISST/edc-dashboard that referenced this issue Oct 20, 2023
ndr-brt pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 20, 2023
* feat(api-management): switch to use contractNegotiation service (#56)

* feat: remove old Policy model and use correct one (#56)
@ndr-brt
Copy link
Member Author

ndr-brt commented Oct 20, 2023

closed by #123

@ndr-brt ndr-brt closed this as completed Oct 20, 2023
janpmeyer added a commit to FraunhoferISST/edc-dashboard that referenced this issue Oct 20, 2023
ndr-brt pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 20, 2023
feat: remove catalogService (#56)
farhin23 pushed a commit to FraunhoferISST/edc-dashboard that referenced this issue Mar 5, 2024
* feat(api-management): switch to use contractNegotiation service (eclipse-edc#56)

* feat: remove old Policy model and use correct one (eclipse-edc#56)
farhin23 pushed a commit to FraunhoferISST/edc-dashboard that referenced this issue Mar 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants