Regenerated Xbase test languages

[LorenzoBettini]

While working on #2349 , I plan to add an Xbase language to test corner cases for #2349 .

To avoid additional changes to be reviewed, I regenerated the Xbase test languages.

The regeneration only changed the copyright year

[cdietrich]

@LorenzoBettini domain model and other xbase based samples missing intentionally?

[LorenzoBettini]

@cdietrich yes: I only regenerated the languages of xbase.testlanguages for the above reasons.

[LorenzoBettini]

@szarnekow I was experimenting with some of the Xbase test languages; if I start the runtime workspace, the Xbase test languages do not generate any Java code. By debugging, I can see that their inferrers are called, but no generation takes place. Is that intentional?

[cdietrich]

Is jvmmodelgenerator bound?

[LorenzoBettini]

Shouldn't that be automatically bound for xbase languages?

[cdietrich]

Is the builder registered in plugin XML

Shouldn't that be automatically bound for xbase languages?

and no testlanguages usually have a custom fragment zoo

how are you testing this?

[LorenzoBettini]

The plugin.xml says

	<extension point="org.eclipse.xtext.builder.participant">
		<participant
			class="org.eclipse.xtext.xbase.testlanguages.bug462047.ui.Bug462047LangExecutableExtensionFactory:org.eclipse.xtext.builder.IXtextBuilderParticipant"
			fileExtensions="bug462047lang"/>
	</extension>

and the runtime module extends the Xbase module that binds JvmModelGenerator.

I start a new workbench and try to edit a file of one of the Xbase test languages. The editor works but nothing is generated, though the model inferrer is used.

What do you mean by custom fragment zoo?

[cdietrich]

fragement = A {}
fragment = B {}
....

btw it works perfectly fine for me

is the file in src folder?

[LorenzoBettini]

Apparently, I was using the wrong file extension, sorry for the noise!