Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discussion on Content Moderation #106

Closed
ChaiBapchya opened this issue Mar 26, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

Discussion on Content Moderation #106

ChaiBapchya opened this issue Mar 26, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@ChaiBapchya
Copy link
Contributor

ChaiBapchya commented Mar 26, 2017

While searching for tools similar to Versionista, this is what I found. I stumbled across a different (from Tracking / Monitoring changes) yet (I think a bit relevant) term - Content Moderation

As we talk about meaningful changes, tracking changes, finding diffs and prioritizing them, one of my searches led me to AWS Marketplace products such as WebPurify Image Moderation, etc which moderate web content / traffic.

Drawing analogy to our use-case, all we are doing is actually moderating the changes.
Under this ambit, also include -

  1. Smart Moderation
    Based on ML, NLP + self-learning like Human
    API Documentation

  2. Implio
    Automated (ML based) + Manual content moderation + Ability to write filters
    Choosing between ML Generic/Custom-made and Filters

  3. IOSquare
    Monitoring, Automated Analysis and Visualization
    IoSquare merged with Besedo

On the flipside

Why automation can never replace human-content-moderation!
It talks about how human intervention is critical when it comes to :-

  • context-awareness
  • Subjectivity to detect subtle references used
  • Cultural references, colloquialisms, and racial slurs

What do you make of this @dcwalk @b5 @danielballan ? Have you heard about it before? Do you find this of any use? Anything worth picking up / learning from?

@danielballan
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, I think there's a useful analogy here.

@danielballan
Copy link
Contributor

Having just caught up on edgi-govdata-archiving/web-monitoring-processing#28 it looks like there are strongly analogies in other prior art, like analyzing Wikipedia edit history.

@dcwalk
Copy link
Contributor

dcwalk commented Mar 27, 2017

Awesome, I agree with @danielballan that there are strong analogies to this and monitoring and it seems like we should definitely be paying attention to how projects are working on moderation to help us think through features of our web monitoring system!

We tend to use the issues in this "overview" repo for meta-organizing across all our projects, but as I interpret this as being about the web monitoring project directly, it likely belongs in there. Are you able to move this issue to https://github.com/edgi-govdata-archiving/web-monitoring @ChaiBapchya ?

@ChaiBapchya
Copy link
Contributor Author

ChaiBapchya commented Mar 27, 2017

I'm glad this finding is relevant and useful.

Alright sure. Will move it to web-monitoring. @dcwalk

@ChaiBapchya
Copy link
Contributor Author

This issue was moved to edgi-govdata-archiving/web-monitoring#29

@titaniumbones
Copy link
Contributor

@danielballan @ChaiBapchya does anyone on this thread actually know where the wikipedia content moderation code is?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants