Skip to content

Conversation

andmat900
Copy link
Contributor

Applicable Issues

Description of the Change

This change allows multiple environment provider jobs during job status checks in EnvironmentRequestReconciler.

Alternate Designs

Possible Drawbacks

Sign-off

Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1

By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:

(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
have the right to submit it under the open source license
indicated in the file; or

(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
license and I have the right under that license to submit that
work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
in the file; or

(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
it.

(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
this project or the open source license(s) involved.

Signed-off-by: Andrei Matveyeu, andrei.matveyeu@axis.com

@andmat900 andmat900 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 16, 2024 14:28
@andmat900 andmat900 requested review from t-persson and fredjn and removed request for a team December 16, 2024 14:28
result.Description = "Failed to provision an environment - Unknown error"
}
condition := metav1.Condition{Type: StatusReady, Status: metav1.ConditionFalse, Reason: "Failed", Message: result.Description}
environmentrequest.Status.Conditions = append(environmentrequest.Status.Conditions, condition)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we want to have multiple of the same condition type added to the status (not even sure if it is allowed by Kubernetes?)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see what you mean.

Will it be enough to concatenate all result.Description strings to a single condition.Message?

The logic for setting environment request status will be:

  • At least one job failed -> environment request failed
  • All jobs successful -> environment request done/successful

Or is there a need for a more sophisticated solution?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think for this case that we can have a more sophisticated solution, especially if we want to show relevant information..

We could try to add more information to Status.EnvironmentProviders which right now is []corev1.ObjectReference. Could this be changed to []ObjectReferenceWithResult.

type ObjectReferenceWithResult struct {
  corev1.ObjectReference
  result Result
}

Then we could show that information on kubectl describe environmentrequest. Not sure if it's worth it though

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed the usage of conditions. Suggesting the simpler solution for now.

if result.Conclusion == ConclusionFailed {
if meta.SetStatusCondition(&environmentrequest.Status.Conditions, metav1.Condition{Type: StatusReady, Status: metav1.ConditionFalse, Reason: "Failed", Message: result.Description}) {
statusUpdated = true
//return r.Status().Update(ctx, environmentrequest)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

@andmat900 andmat900 requested a review from t-persson January 20, 2025 12:34
@andmat900 andmat900 merged commit 7982f2e into eiffel-community:main Jan 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants