Skip to content

Conversation

rockdaboot
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes this warning in the GitHub CI annotations:
The following actions use a deprecated Node.js version and will be forced to run on node20: actions/upload-artifact@v3.
For more info: https://github.blog/changelog/2024-03-07-github-actions-all-actions-will-run-on-node20-instead-of-node16-by-default/

Fixes this warning in the GitHub CI annotations:
The following actions use a deprecated Node.js version and will be forced to
run on node20: actions/upload-artifact@v3.
For more info: https://github.blog/changelog/2024-03-07-github-actions-all-actions-will-run-on-node20-instead-of-node16-by-default/
@github-actions github-actions bot added the aws-λ-extension AWS Lambda Extension label Aug 13, 2024
@kruskall
Copy link
Member

This should be kept up to date by dependabot. Why didn't we get a pr ? 🤔

@rockdaboot
Copy link
Contributor Author

This should be kept up to date by dependabot. Why didn't we get a pr ? 🤔

Good point. I just searched the PRs and found:
#446

Missing reasoning why the PR was closed.
@reakaleek Do you remember?

@reakaleek
Copy link
Member

reakaleek commented Aug 19, 2024

This should be kept up to date by dependabot. Why didn't we get a pr ? 🤔

Good point. I just searched the PRs and found: #446

Missing reasoning why the PR was closed. @reakaleek Do you remember?

The actions/upload-artifact@v4 action had a breaking change. We had to skip the update in several repositories because some workflows couldn't handle the change. Also, it is/was incompatible with our custom actions.

I might have skipped it as a precaution here. We still need to migrate to v4 properly.

If v4 is working correctly in this repo, please feel free to go ahead.

@rockdaboot
Copy link
Contributor Author

rockdaboot commented Aug 19, 2024

@reakaleek Thanks for the details.
We only use @V3 in one place:

  test:
    strategy:
      fail-fast: false
      matrix:
        platform:
          - "ubuntu-latest"
          - "macos-latest"
    runs-on: ${{ matrix.platform }}
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - name: Bootstrap Action Workspace
        uses: ./.github/actions/bootstrap
      - name: Test
        run: make test junitfile="${{ matrix.platform }}-junit-report.xml"
      - uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
        if: success() || failure()
        with:
          name: test-results-${{ matrix.platform }}
          path: '*-junit-report.xml'

To decide if updating v3 to v4 is working correctly, we need to know who the consumer of *-junit-report.xml is. Do you have any information about this?

[UPDATE] Just found this

 report:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: elastic/apm-pipeline-library/.github/actions/test-report@current
        with:
          artifact: /test-results-(.*)/
          name: 'JUnit Tests $1'
          path: "*-junit-report.xml"        # Path to test results (inside artifact .zip)
          reporter: java-junit              # Format of test results

@reakaleek
Copy link
Member

@reakaleek Thanks for the details. We only use @V3 in one place:

  test:
    strategy:
      fail-fast: false
      matrix:
        platform:
          - "ubuntu-latest"
          - "macos-latest"
    runs-on: ${{ matrix.platform }}
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - name: Bootstrap Action Workspace
        uses: ./.github/actions/bootstrap
      - name: Test
        run: make test junitfile="${{ matrix.platform }}-junit-report.xml"
      - uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
        if: success() || failure()
        with:
          name: test-results-${{ matrix.platform }}
          path: '*-junit-report.xml'

To decide if updating v3 to v4 is working correctly, we need to know who the consumer of *-junit-report.xml is. Do you have any information about this?

[UPDATE] Just found this

 report:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: elastic/apm-pipeline-library/.github/actions/test-report@current
        with:
          artifact: /test-results-(.*)/
          name: 'JUnit Tests $1'
          path: "*-junit-report.xml"        # Path to test results (inside artifact .zip)
          reporter: java-junit              # Format of test results

@reakaleek Thanks for the details. We only use @V3 in one place:

  test:
    strategy:
      fail-fast: false
      matrix:
        platform:
          - "ubuntu-latest"
          - "macos-latest"
    runs-on: ${{ matrix.platform }}
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - name: Bootstrap Action Workspace
        uses: ./.github/actions/bootstrap
      - name: Test
        run: make test junitfile="${{ matrix.platform }}-junit-report.xml"
      - uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
        if: success() || failure()
        with:
          name: test-results-${{ matrix.platform }}
          path: '*-junit-report.xml'

To decide if updating v3 to v4 is working correctly, we need to know who the consumer of *-junit-report.xml is. Do you have any information about this?

Ah, thank you for the context. The only consumer of the junit report is https://github.com/elastic/apm-aws-lambda/actions/workflows/test-reporter.yml, but it's disabled because it's broken for another reason, which we haven't been able to solve yet.

I think this workflow was actually the reason why we did not upgrade to v4.

In some repositories, we dismissed the test reporter workflow entirely. Hence, you can upgrade to v4.

@rockdaboot rockdaboot enabled auto-merge (squash) August 19, 2024 09:17
@rockdaboot
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kruskall Do you mind to approve?

@rockdaboot rockdaboot requested a review from kruskall August 19, 2024 09:18
@rockdaboot rockdaboot merged commit 6a4ee87 into elastic:main Aug 19, 2024
10 checks passed
@rockdaboot rockdaboot deleted the update-upload-artifact branch August 19, 2024 09:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
aws-λ-extension AWS Lambda Extension
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants