Skip to content

Conversation

richard-dennehy
Copy link
Contributor

@richard-dennehy richard-dennehy commented Apr 14, 2025

Update JWT documentation to mention at+jwt support introduced here

Rendered here

@richard-dennehy richard-dennehy added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request labels Apr 14, 2025
@richard-dennehy richard-dennehy requested a review from n1v0lg April 14, 2025 15:47
@richard-dennehy richard-dennehy marked this pull request as ready for review April 14, 2025 15:47
Copy link

@n1v0lg n1v0lg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM w.r.t. content. Pending docs team feedback on whether this is the way to specify ES version support.

@n1v0lg n1v0lg requested a review from a team April 15, 2025 12:14
Copy link
Contributor

@leemthompo leemthompo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM2, thanks!

@leemthompo leemthompo enabled auto-merge (squash) April 22, 2025 11:58
@leemthompo leemthompo merged commit 460e6d7 into main Apr 22, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@leemthompo leemthompo deleted the at+jwt-support branch April 22, 2025 11:59
shainaraskas added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2025
@shainaraskas shainaraskas restored the at+jwt-support branch April 22, 2025 14:32
leemthompo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request v9.1.0

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants