Skip to content

Conversation

lcawl
Copy link
Contributor

@lcawl lcawl commented Sep 17, 2025

Relates to #2795

This PR updates the introductory Versioning and availability page.
It is a work in progress until we address the following feedback:

  • Add new Elastic intro section #2795 (comment): "I don't know if this [Examples of where availability can vary] section is very clear. I think it could use some more details or introductory content. Somewhere on this page, we should try to explain a few things, how these multiple, differently versioned, products work together and how this can impact availability:
    • Elastic Cloud, ECE, and ECK are orchestrators used to create and manage serverless projects (Elastic Cloud only) and deployments of the Elastic Stack
    • The versions of the Elastic Stack that you can deploy depend on the version of these orchestrators. For example, Elastic Stack 9.0 is not available to deploy on ECE 3.1.
    • Because some products are released on different schedules and have different architecture or network constraints, it is possible that a feature isn't available for some deployment types, or becomes available at a different time for each deployment type."
  • Add new Elastic intro section #2795 (comment) "we also do some of this explanation on the following surfaces and you can mine them for language / make sure they align:
  • Add new Elastic intro section #2795 (comment) "> Because some products are released on different schedules... would be careful with this because a lot of functionality is controlled by the stack version. might indicate that these are usually at the admin layer rather than the storage/querying layer of elastic. examples would be helpful (e.g. not all auth types are available for all deployment types [e.g. ldap] - that's kind of a layer "above" / "around" the es engine)"

@lcawl lcawl added the wip label Sep 17, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 17, 2025

@jmikell821 jmikell821 marked this pull request as ready for review September 29, 2025 21:33
@jmikell821 jmikell821 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 29, 2025 21:33
Copy link
Contributor

@georgewallace georgewallace left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm good with the changes, I just have one question. If the content at the bottom is removed we need to find a proper place for it to not have loss of information.

@theletterf theletterf requested a review from a team as a code owner September 30, 2025 07:53
@theletterf theletterf merged commit d21fdfc into elastic:main Sep 30, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants