-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 153
[E&A][Troubleshoot][Reference] 9.2 data management menu #3319
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[E&A][Troubleshoot][Reference] 9.2 data management menu #3319
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Left optional edits for consistency. Adding "management" after every page name feels a little heavy-handed, but repeating it to enforce the idea that management pages are under Stack Management might be worth it.
explore-analyze/machine-learning/nlp/ml-nlp-text-emb-vector-search-example.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
couple of small comments addressing the following trends:
- passing references to nav items no longer have wayfinding in a couple of spots
- a couple of instances of double wayfinding where we tell them to open the menu, and then in the same step tell them to find something in a menu :)
otherwise g2g
troubleshoot/elasticsearch/diagnosing-corrupted-repositories.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Nastasha Solomon <79124755+nastasha-solomon@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nastasha Solomon <79124755+nastasha-solomon@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: shainaraskas <58563081+shainaraskas@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Colleen McGinnis <colleen.j.mcginnis@gmail.com>
This PR updates references to pages that are moving from Stack Management to Data Management in 9.2 for the following folders of the docs-content repo:
I also checked the following and there are no occurrences to fix there:
Separate PRs will be made by their owners for /solutions, /deploy-manage, and /manage-data
Closes: #3274
Closes: #3271
Closes: #3275
Closes: #3276