Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[8.14] [MGMTEX] Fix action data override when adding a second action (#181604) #181691

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2024

Conversation

kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Backport

This will backport the following commits from main to 8.14:

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation

…c#181604)

## Summary

We were overwriting the `actionTypeId` of the first action in the
"create connector" callback. The value assigned was the `actionTypeId`
of the newly created action, meaning that we would have converted the
first action to be the same as the second one. This fix changes the
`actionTypeId` not for the first option but for all current
`activeActionItem.indices`.

Previously, we did add that override to fix a bug related to the slack
connector elastic#155722. Its test
should cover us from breaking it back again. I did test it manually just
in case and it seems to be working still. Feel free to test it too.

Also, if you are wondering why `activeActionItems.indices` is an array
of numbers. The user might be using the same connector in more than one
action and then delete the connector. In case this happens, and the user
clicks on "edit rule", they will be able to restore both actions by just
creating the connector once. In order to be able to restore all affected
actions, their index is being stored as a number[]. More info here
elastic#86838

Closes elastic#181407

---------

Co-authored-by: Antonio <antoniodcoelho@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 60c6cdb)
@kibana-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

💚 Build Succeeded

Metrics [docs]

Async chunks

Total size of all lazy-loaded chunks that will be downloaded as the user navigates the app

id before after diff
triggersActionsUi 1.6MB 1.6MB +26.0B

To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with:
@elasticmachine merge upstream

cc @jcger

@kibanamachine kibanamachine merged commit 36d2b93 into elastic:8.14 Apr 25, 2024
34 checks passed
jcger added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2024
…181604) (#181721)

# Backport

This will backport the following commits from `main` to `8.13`:
- [[MGMTEX] Fix action data override when adding a second action
(#181604)](#181604)

<!--- Backport version: 8.9.8 -->

### Questions ?
Please refer to the [Backport tool
documentation](https://github.com/sqren/backport)

<!--BACKPORT [{"author":{"name":"Julian
Gernun","email":"17549662+jcger@users.noreply.github.com"},"sourceCommit":{"committedDate":"2024-04-25T10:42:28Z","message":"[MGMTEX]
Fix action data override when adding a second action (#181604)\n\n##
Summary\r\n\r\nWe were overwriting the `actionTypeId` of the first
action in the\r\n\"create connector\" callback. The value assigned was
the `actionTypeId`\r\nof the newly created action, meaning that we would
have converted the\r\nfirst action to be the same as the second one.
This fix changes the\r\n`actionTypeId` not for the first option but for
all current\r\n`activeActionItem.indices`.\r\n\r\nPreviously, we did add
that override to fix a bug related to the slack\r\nconnector
#155722. Its test\r\nshould
cover us from breaking it back again. I did test it manually just\r\nin
case and it seems to be working still. Feel free to test it
too.\r\n\r\nAlso, if you are wondering why `activeActionItems.indices`
is an array\r\nof numbers. The user might be using the same connector in
more than one\r\naction and then delete the connector. In case this
happens, and the user\r\nclicks on \"edit rule\", they will be able to
restore both actions by just\r\ncreating the connector once. In order to
be able to restore all affected\r\nactions, their index is being stored
as a number[]. More info
here\r\nhttps://github.com//pull/86838\r\n\r\nCloses
https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/181407\r\n\r\n---------\r\n\r\nCo-authored-by:
Antonio
<antoniodcoelho@gmail.com>","sha":"60c6cdb9985570a6f58bbf3860539de64ace9aa6","branchLabelMapping":{"^v8.15.0$":"main","^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$":"$1.$2"}},"sourcePullRequest":{"labels":["release_note:fix","Team:ResponseOps","Feature:Alerting/RuleActions","v8.13.0","v8.14.0","v8.15.0"],"number":181604,"url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/181604","mergeCommit":{"message":"[MGMTEX]
Fix action data override when adding a second action (#181604)\n\n##
Summary\r\n\r\nWe were overwriting the `actionTypeId` of the first
action in the\r\n\"create connector\" callback. The value assigned was
the `actionTypeId`\r\nof the newly created action, meaning that we would
have converted the\r\nfirst action to be the same as the second one.
This fix changes the\r\n`actionTypeId` not for the first option but for
all current\r\n`activeActionItem.indices`.\r\n\r\nPreviously, we did add
that override to fix a bug related to the slack\r\nconnector
#155722. Its test\r\nshould
cover us from breaking it back again. I did test it manually just\r\nin
case and it seems to be working still. Feel free to test it
too.\r\n\r\nAlso, if you are wondering why `activeActionItems.indices`
is an array\r\nof numbers. The user might be using the same connector in
more than one\r\naction and then delete the connector. In case this
happens, and the user\r\nclicks on \"edit rule\", they will be able to
restore both actions by just\r\ncreating the connector once. In order to
be able to restore all affected\r\nactions, their index is being stored
as a number[]. More info
here\r\nhttps://github.com//pull/86838\r\n\r\nCloses
https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/181407\r\n\r\n---------\r\n\r\nCo-authored-by:
Antonio
<antoniodcoelho@gmail.com>","sha":"60c6cdb9985570a6f58bbf3860539de64ace9aa6"}},"sourceBranch":"main","suggestedTargetBranches":["8.13"],"targetPullRequestStates":[{"branch":"8.13","label":"v8.13.0","labelRegex":"^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$","isSourceBranch":false,"state":"NOT_CREATED"},{"branch":"8.14","label":"v8.14.0","labelRegex":"^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$","isSourceBranch":false,"url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/181691","number":181691,"state":"MERGED","mergeCommit":{"sha":"36d2b9310c5388c444f90c520b6563360caa5d99","message":"[8.14]
[MGMTEX] Fix action data override when adding a second action (#181604)
(#181691)\n\n# Backport\n\nThis will backport the following commits from
`main` to `8.14`:\n- [[MGMTEX] Fix action data override when adding a
second
action\n(#181604)](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/181604)\n\n<!---
Backport version: 9.4.3 -->\n\n### Questions ?\nPlease refer to the
[Backport
tool\ndocumentation](https://github.com/sqren/backport)\n\n<!--BACKPORT
[{\"author\":{\"name\":\"Julian\nGernun\",\"email\":\"17549662+jcger@users.noreply.github.com\"},\"sourceCommit\":{\"committedDate\":\"2024-04-25T10:42:28Z\",\"message\":\"[MGMTEX]\nFix
action data override when adding a second action
(#181604)\\n\\n##\nSummary\\r\\n\\r\\nWe were overwriting the
`actionTypeId` of the first\naction in the\\r\\n\\\"create connector\\\"
callback. The value assigned was\nthe `actionTypeId`\\r\\nof the newly
created action, meaning that we would\nhave converted the\\r\\nfirst
action to be the same as the second one.\nThis fix changes
the\\r\\n`actionTypeId` not for the first option but for\nall
current\\r\\n`activeActionItem.indices`.\\r\\n\\r\\nPreviously, we did
add\nthat override to fix a bug related to the
slack\\r\\nconnector\nhttps://github.com//issues/155722.
Its test\\r\\nshould\ncover us from breaking it back again. I did test
it manually just\\r\\nin\ncase and it seems to be working still. Feel
free to test it\ntoo.\\r\\n\\r\\nAlso, if you are wondering why
`activeActionItems.indices`\nis an array\\r\\nof numbers. The user might
be using the same connector in\nmore than one\\r\\naction and then
delete the connector. In case this\nhappens, and the user\\r\\nclicks on
\\\"edit rule\\\", they will be able to\nrestore both actions by
just\\r\\ncreating the connector once. In order to\nbe able to restore
all affected\\r\\nactions, their index is being stored\nas a number[].
More
info\nhere\\r\\nhttps://github.com//pull/86838\\r\\n\\r\\nCloses\nhttps://github.com//issues/181407\\r\\n\\r\\n---------\\r\\n\\r\\nCo-authored-by:\nAntonio\n<antoniodcoelho@gmail.com>\",\"sha\":\"60c6cdb9985570a6f58bbf3860539de64ace9aa6\",\"branchLabelMapping\":{\"^v8.15.0$\":\"main\",\"^v(\\\\d+).(\\\\d+).\\\\d+$\":\"$1.$2\"}},\"sourcePullRequest\":{\"labels\":[\"release_note:fix\",\"Team:ResponseOps\",\"Feature:Alerting/RuleActions\",\"v8.13.0\",\"v8.14.0\",\"v8.15.0\"],\"title\":\"[MGMTEX]\nFix
action data override when adding a
second\naction\",\"number\":181604,\"url\":\"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/181604\",\"mergeCommit\":{\"message\":\"[MGMTEX]\nFix
action data override when adding a second action
(#181604)\\n\\n##\nSummary\\r\\n\\r\\nWe were overwriting the
`actionTypeId` of the first\naction in the\\r\\n\\\"create connector\\\"
callback. The value assigned was\nthe `actionTypeId`\\r\\nof the newly
created action, meaning that we would\nhave converted the\\r\\nfirst
action to be the same as the second one.\nThis fix changes
the\\r\\n`actionTypeId` not for the first option but for\nall
current\\r\\n`activeActionItem.indices`.\\r\\n\\r\\nPreviously, we did
add\nthat override to fix a bug related to the
slack\\r\\nconnector\nhttps://github.com//issues/155722.
Its test\\r\\nshould\ncover us from breaking it back again. I did test
it manually just\\r\\nin\ncase and it seems to be working still. Feel
free to test it\ntoo.\\r\\n\\r\\nAlso, if you are wondering why
`activeActionItems.indices`\nis an array\\r\\nof numbers. The user might
be using the same connector in\nmore than one\\r\\naction and then
delete the connector. In case this\nhappens, and the user\\r\\nclicks on
\\\"edit rule\\\", they will be able to\nrestore both actions by
just\\r\\ncreating the connector once. In order to\nbe able to restore
all affected\\r\\nactions, their index is being stored\nas a number[].
More
info\nhere\\r\\nhttps://github.com//pull/86838\\r\\n\\r\\nCloses\nhttps://github.com//issues/181407\\r\\n\\r\\n---------\\r\\n\\r\\nCo-authored-by:\nAntonio\n<antoniodcoelho@gmail.com>\",\"sha\":\"60c6cdb9985570a6f58bbf3860539de64ace9aa6\"}},\"sourceBranch\":\"main\",\"suggestedTargetBranches\":[\"8.13\",\"8.14\"],\"targetPullRequestStates\":[{\"branch\":\"8.13\",\"label\":\"v8.13.0\",\"branchLabelMappingKey\":\"^v(\\\\d+).(\\\\d+).\\\\d+$\",\"isSourceBranch\":false,\"state\":\"NOT_CREATED\"},{\"branch\":\"8.14\",\"label\":\"v8.14.0\",\"branchLabelMappingKey\":\"^v(\\\\d+).(\\\\d+).\\\\d+$\",\"isSourceBranch\":false,\"state\":\"NOT_CREATED\"},{\"branch\":\"main\",\"label\":\"v8.15.0\",\"branchLabelMappingKey\":\"^v8.15.0$\",\"isSourceBranch\":true,\"state\":\"MERGED\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/181604\",\"number\":181604,\"mergeCommit\":{\"message\":\"[MGMTEX]\nFix
action data override when adding a second action
(#181604)\\n\\n##\nSummary\\r\\n\\r\\nWe were overwriting the
`actionTypeId` of the first\naction in the\\r\\n\\\"create connector\\\"
callback. The value assigned was\nthe `actionTypeId`\\r\\nof the newly
created action, meaning that we would\nhave converted the\\r\\nfirst
action to be the same as the second one.\nThis fix changes
the\\r\\n`actionTypeId` not for the first option but for\nall
current\\r\\n`activeActionItem.indices`.\\r\\n\\r\\nPreviously, we did
add\nthat override to fix a bug related to the
slack\\r\\nconnector\nhttps://github.com//issues/155722.
Its test\\r\\nshould\ncover us from breaking it back again. I did test
it manually just\\r\\nin\ncase and it seems to be working still. Feel
free to test it\ntoo.\\r\\n\\r\\nAlso, if you are wondering why
`activeActionItems.indices`\nis an array\\r\\nof numbers. The user might
be using the same connector in\nmore than one\\r\\naction and then
delete the connector. In case this\nhappens, and the user\\r\\nclicks on
\\\"edit rule\\\", they will be able to\nrestore both actions by
just\\r\\ncreating the connector once. In order to\nbe able to restore
all affected\\r\\nactions, their index is being stored\nas a number[].
More
info\nhere\\r\\nhttps://github.com//pull/86838\\r\\n\\r\\nCloses\nhttps://github.com//issues/181407\\r\\n\\r\\n---------\\r\\n\\r\\nCo-authored-by:\nAntonio\n<antoniodcoelho@gmail.com>\",\"sha\":\"60c6cdb9985570a6f58bbf3860539de64ace9aa6\"}}]}]\nBACKPORT-->\n\nCo-authored-by:
Julian Gernun
<17549662+jcger@users.noreply.github.com>"}},{"branch":"main","label":"v8.15.0","labelRegex":"^v8.15.0$","isSourceBranch":true,"state":"MERGED","url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/181604","number":181604,"mergeCommit":{"message":"[MGMTEX]
Fix action data override when adding a second action (#181604)\n\n##
Summary\r\n\r\nWe were overwriting the `actionTypeId` of the first
action in the\r\n\"create connector\" callback. The value assigned was
the `actionTypeId`\r\nof the newly created action, meaning that we would
have converted the\r\nfirst action to be the same as the second one.
This fix changes the\r\n`actionTypeId` not for the first option but for
all current\r\n`activeActionItem.indices`.\r\n\r\nPreviously, we did add
that override to fix a bug related to the slack\r\nconnector
#155722. Its test\r\nshould
cover us from breaking it back again. I did test it manually just\r\nin
case and it seems to be working still. Feel free to test it
too.\r\n\r\nAlso, if you are wondering why `activeActionItems.indices`
is an array\r\nof numbers. The user might be using the same connector in
more than one\r\naction and then delete the connector. In case this
happens, and the user\r\nclicks on \"edit rule\", they will be able to
restore both actions by just\r\ncreating the connector once. In order to
be able to restore all affected\r\nactions, their index is being stored
as a number[]. More info
here\r\nhttps://github.com//pull/86838\r\n\r\nCloses
https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/181407\r\n\r\n---------\r\n\r\nCo-authored-by:
Antonio
<antoniodcoelho@gmail.com>","sha":"60c6cdb9985570a6f58bbf3860539de64ace9aa6"}}]}]
BACKPORT-->
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants