Skip to content

Review of README.md #9086

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 28, 2019
Merged

Review of README.md #9086

merged 3 commits into from
May 28, 2019

Conversation

eksperimental
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@eksperimental eksperimental force-pushed the review_README branch 2 times, most recently from e004460 to 3590191 Compare May 28, 2019 04:57
@josevalim josevalim merged commit 786a3d2 into elixir-lang:master May 28, 2019
@josevalim
Copy link
Member

❤️ 💚 💙 💛 💜

@eksperimental
Copy link
Contributor Author

@josevalim I think it is important to mention in the README what the official communication channels are, to avoid issues like this #8931.
Personally, I thought the Elixir Forum is an official channel, but it is not.
As of now, one needs to dig deep into the Code of Conduct to find out which are these channels.

@josevalim
Copy link
Member

To be honest, given the tone of the linked discussion, I don't think adding this information to the README would have changed anything, especially since they were told this at some point but it didn't change the conversation much.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@eksperimental @josevalim