Skip to content
/ auto Public

Decision procedure for intuitionistic logic

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

elliottt/auto

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

38 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

auto

An implementation of CONTRACTION-FREE SEQUENT CALCULI FOR INTUITIONISTIC LOGIC by Roy Dyckhoff.

Commands

  • help will give a short summary of each command.
  • The ? command (which unfortunately requires its full argument to be quoted) will derive a term in the lambda calculus for the given logical formula, if it's possible to do so.
  • ?! will derive a term and apply simplification rules to turn it into something a bit more readable.
  • prove will somewhat clunkily display the proof tree constructed that's used to derive the terms of the lambda calculus.
auto> ? (A \/ B) -> (A -> C) -> (B -> C) -> C
λ a: A ∨ B. λ b: A → C. λ c: B → C.
  match a {
    Left d ->
      let e = b d in e
    Right f ->
      let g = c f in g
  }
auto> ?! (A \/ B) -> (A -> C) -> (B -> C) -> C
λ a: A ∨ B. λ b: A → C. λ c: B → C.
  match a {
    Left d -> b d
    Right f -> c f
  }
auto> prove (A \/ B) -> (A -> C) -> (B -> C) -> C

          ------------- Axiom
          C, A, B → C ⇒ C
        ------------- IMP-VAR-L
        A, B → C, A → C ⇒ C
          ------------- Axiom
          C, B, A → C ⇒ C
        ------------- IMP-VAR-L
        B, B → C, A → C ⇒ C
      ------------- OR-L
      B → C, A → C, A ∨ B ⇒ C
    ------------- IMP-R
    A → C, A ∨ B ⇒ (B → C) → C
  ------------- IMP-R
  A ∨ B ⇒ (A → C) → (B → C) → C
------------- IMP-R
A ∨ B → (A → C) → (B → C) → C
auto>

References

I came across a stack overflow question a long time back when wondering how the haskell program djinn worked. Lennart Augustsson gave a helpful answer, and through a series of jumps that I don't remember now, I came across the paper CONTRACTION-FREE SEQUENT CALCULI FOR INTUITIONISTIC LOGIC. That paper gives a pretty clear outline of the decision procedure that Lennart mentions in his reply. After reading the paper I decided to implement auto to put it into practice and learn some more rust in the process.

TODO

It would be really nice if the input language knew about ADT declarations and type aliases, as that would push it up to feature parity with djinn. There's a start on this in the form of the data and env commands, but it's fun to play around with in its current state, so I'm happy to call it done.

The REPL doesn't currently support history or editing commands, which makes interacting with it a chore. Fixing these problems would be great.

About

Decision procedure for intuitionistic logic

Topics

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Languages