Review: sdtm-ae-coding

[wangben718]

Review of the sdtm-ae-coding benchmark.

Question	Answer
Task: Would you agree that the benchmark use case represents real data derivation in clinical trials?	Agree
Inputs: Would you agree that the inputs and outputs represent real data structures collected in clinical trials?	Disagree
AI-assisted review: Would you agree with how this benchmark handles each potential concern below?	Disagree
Overall	Not approve

Comments

1. AETERM is required variable so it should not contains NULL value in SDTM output. 2. Many sponsors will upper-case AETERM to avoid the case for the "headache" not matched with "Headache" in subject 107

[pzhang724]

@wangben718 Thank you for this review. We changed sdtm-ae-coding based on it (#4377, merged in #4399). The website shows the new version now.

Please review it again:

1. Open the benchmark page.
2. Answer the questions and select Submit and next.
3. On GitHub, select Start discussion.

This makes a new review. Your new review replaces your old review. Please do not edit your old review, and do not reply to it with new answers. A reply does not count as a review.

Thank you!