Review: adam-adsl-investigator-comment

[hellomingchun]

Review of the adam-adsl-investigator-comment benchmark.

Question	Answer
Task: Would you agree that the benchmark use case represents real data derivation in clinical trials?	Agree
Inputs: Would you agree that the inputs and outputs represent real data structures collected in clinical trials?	Disagree
AI-assisted review: Would you agree with how this benchmark handles each potential concern below?	Agree
Overall	Not approve

Comments

Whitespace-only fields to be equivalent to missing data. I think CMTFL for 106 would be N.

[pzhang724]

@hellomingchun Thank you for this review. We changed adam-adsl-investigator-comment based on it (#4438, merged in #4467). The website shows the new version now.

Please review it again:

1. Open the benchmark page.
2. Answer the questions and select Submit and next.
3. On GitHub, select Start discussion.

This makes a new review. Your new review replaces your old review. Please do not edit your old review, and do not reply to it with new answers. A reply does not count as a review.

Thank you!