Skip to content

Conversation

ifarbod
Copy link
Contributor

@ifarbod ifarbod commented Sep 5, 2025

Closes #239

image

@ifarbod
Copy link
Contributor Author

ifarbod commented Sep 5, 2025

Formatting issue fixed, the WASM stuff I have no idea if it's my fault or not

@tomsons26
Copy link
Contributor

Works as intended for even the complex tables i could find in my target

@encounter encounter merged commit 7cc6ed2 into encounter:main Sep 7, 2025
20 checks passed
@ifarbod ifarbod deleted the indirect-byte-table branch September 8, 2025 00:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

x86: Indirect Jump Tables Not Properly Handled in ObjDiff
3 participants