Feature/styles #15
Feature/styles #15
Conversation
refactordoc/items/argument_item.py
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should this be an absolute import?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, there are a number of problems with this PR currently and it is not ready for review (please note the in-progress label) sorry for the confusion.
# By itziakos # Via itziakos * origin/feature/styles: fix tests update the section methods start updading the section rendering methods better separate the items and thier parsing constructors from the renderers add a subpackage for renderers update tests minor cleanup minor cleanup rework class and function tests to old_style tests remove unused classes move code for old_styles to the styles module provide eaiser access to the Items and fix code factor out section refactoring functions to the sections module subclass namedtuple use the Item as a base class factor out Item
Conflicts: .travis.yml
|
@sjagoe, This PR is ready for review now. The main feature is the ability to fine tune the rendering behaviour thought defining new rendering The new components are:
Tests have been also updated. |
|
I'll try to look at it today. |
docs/source/old_style.rst
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This can use a better name. What is old style? Is it what was used in refactordoc? If so, call it that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes this is the style that refactordoc uses, but I want to discourage its use. I could call it something like simple.
This pr provides a major refactoring effort forv section doc (former refactor doc). the package layout has been rearranged into syles, sections, parsiing definition, renderers
implements #13