feat: Add generated test case #17
Conversation
WalkthroughAdds a new Playwright test (generated.test.js) that loads a local HTML page, waits for a spinner to disappear, verifies the first carousel slide is active and its links are enabled, waits for autoplay to advance, verifies the second slide is active, and confirms the first slide is no longer visible. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
actor T as Test Runner
participant P as Playwright Page
participant H as HTML Page
participant C as Hero Carousel
participant S1 as Slide 1
participant S2 as Slide 2
T->>P: goto(file://.../index.html)
P->>H: Load resources
H-->>P: Render with spinner
T->>P: Wait for spinner to be hidden
P->>C: Ensure carousel visible
T->>P: Assert S1 heading visible
T->>P: Assert S1 "Read More" and "Join Now" enabled
Note over P,C: Wait for autoplay (~10s)
C->>S2: Activate
S1-->>C: Deactivate
T->>P: Assert S2 heading visible
T->>P: Assert S2 links enabled
T->>P: Assert S1 heading not visible
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
generated.test.js(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (2.1.2)
generated.test.js
[error] 6-6: Expected a semicolon or an implicit semicolon after a statement, but found none
An explicit or implicit semicolon is expected here...
...Which is required to end this statement
(parse)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
generated.test.js (1)
10-17: LGTM!The
beforeEachhook properly ensures the page is ready by waiting for the spinner to disappear and the carousel to be visible before each test runs.
| import path from 'path'; | ||
|
|
||
| // Define the path to the local HTML file | ||
| const pageURL = `file://${path.resolve(__dirname, 'source code/index.html')}`; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the missing semicolon.
There is a syntax error: the statement is missing a semicolon.
Apply this diff to fix the syntax error:
-const pageURL = `file://${path.resolve(__dirname, 'source code/index.html')}`
+const pageURL = `file://${path.resolve(__dirname, 'source code/index.html')}`;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const pageURL = `file://${path.resolve(__dirname, 'source code/index.html')}`; | |
| const pageURL = `file://${path.resolve(__dirname, 'source code/index.html')}`; |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (2.1.2)
[error] 6-6: Expected a semicolon or an implicit semicolon after a statement, but found none
An explicit or implicit semicolon is expected here...
...Which is required to end this statement
(parse)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In generated.test.js around line 6, the statement assigning pageURL is missing a
trailing semicolon; add a semicolon to the end of the line (after the closing
backtick) so the statement terminates correctly and the file parses; run the
linter or tests to confirm the syntax error is resolved.
| const activeSlide = page.locator('.owl-carousel-item.active'); | ||
|
|
||
| // Verify the "Read More" button is visible and enabled on the active slide. | ||
| const readMoreButton = activeSlide.getByRole('link', { name: 'Read More' }); | ||
| await expect(readMoreButton).toBeVisible(); | ||
| await expect(readMoreButton).toBeEnabled(); | ||
|
|
||
| // Verify the "Join Now" button is visible and enabled on the active slide. | ||
| const joinNowButton = activeSlide.getByRole('link', { name: 'Join Now' }); | ||
| await expect(joinNowButton).toBeVisible(); | ||
| await expect(joinNowButton).toBeEnabled(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential race condition with active slide selector.
The selector .owl-carousel-item.active may match multiple slides during Owl Carousel's transition animation, especially since Owl Carousel clones slides for seamless looping. This could cause flakiness when querying buttons within activeSlide.
Consider adding a more specific selector or waiting for the transition to stabilize:
// Find the currently active carousel item.
- const activeSlide = page.locator('.owl-carousel-item.active');
+ const activeSlide = page.locator('.owl-carousel-item.active').first();Additionally, consider verifying that only one slide is active before proceeding:
// Ensure exactly one active slide before checking buttons
await expect(page.locator('.owl-carousel-item.active')).toHaveCount(1, { timeout: 5000 });
const activeSlide = page.locator('.owl-carousel-item.active');🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In generated.test.js around lines 27 to 37, the selector
'.owl-carousel-item.active' can match multiple elements during Owl Carousel
transitions (and due to cloned slides), causing flakiness; ensure the transition
has stabilized and exactly one active slide exists before querying buttons by
awaiting a locator check that the count of '.owl-carousel-item.active' is 1
(with a reasonable timeout), then re-query that single active slide and proceed
to assert the Read More and Join Now buttons are visible and enabled; optionally
add a short wait for any transition CSS/animation to finish if needed.
| const secondActiveSlide = page.locator('.owl-carousel-item.active'); | ||
|
|
||
| // Verify the "Read More" button is visible and enabled on the new active slide. | ||
| const secondReadMoreButton = secondActiveSlide.getByRole('link', { name: 'Read More' }); | ||
| await expect(secondReadMoreButton).toBeVisible(); | ||
| await expect(secondReadMoreButton).toBeEnabled(); | ||
|
|
||
| // Verify the "Join Now" button is visible and enabled on the new active slide. | ||
| const secondJoinNowButton = secondActiveSlide.getByRole('link', { name: 'Join Now' }); | ||
| await expect(secondJoinNowButton).toBeVisible(); | ||
| await expect(secondJoinNowButton).toBeEnabled(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same race condition issue with active slide selector.
The same selector reliability concern applies here. When re-locating the active slide after transition, .owl-carousel-item.active may still match multiple elements during animation.
Apply the same fix as suggested for the first active slide:
// Re-locate the active slide, which should now be the second one.
- const secondActiveSlide = page.locator('.owl-carousel-item.active');
+ const secondActiveSlide = page.locator('.owl-carousel-item.active').first();Or verify count first:
await expect(page.locator('.owl-carousel-item.active')).toHaveCount(1, { timeout: 5000 });
const secondActiveSlide = page.locator('.owl-carousel-item.active');🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In generated.test.js around lines 51 to 61, the active-slide selector
`.owl-carousel-item.active` can match multiple elements during transition
causing a race; ensure the test waits until there is exactly one active slide
before using it (for example, assert toHaveCount(1) with a reasonable timeout)
and then re-locate the single active slide and proceed to check the "Read More"
and "Join Now" buttons; this guarantees the locator targets the intended slide
after animation completes.
| await expect(secondJoinNowButton).toBeEnabled(); | ||
|
|
||
| // Finally, confirm the first slide's heading is no longer visible to ensure the transition is complete. | ||
| await expect(firstSlideHeading).not.toBeVisible(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion | 🟠 Major
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify the final assertion accounts for cloned slides.
Owl Carousel clones slides for seamless infinite looping. The first slide's heading may still exist in the DOM as a clone, which could cause this assertion to fail even after a successful transition.
Run the following script to check if the HTML uses Owl Carousel with loop/cloning enabled:
If cloning is enabled, consider asserting on the active state instead:
// Instead of checking visibility, verify the first slide is no longer active
await expect(firstSlideHeading.locator('xpath=ancestor::*[contains(@class, "owl-carousel-item")]')).not.toHaveClass(/active/);🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if Owl Carousel is configured with cloning/looping
# Search for Owl Carousel initialization with loop option
rg -n -A 10 -B 2 '\.owlCarousel\(' 'source code/'
# Also check for data attributes that enable looping
rg -n 'data-loop|data-clone' 'source code/'Length of output: 1291
Assert slide inactive rather than invisible
Owl Carousel’s loop: true clones slides, so the original slide’s heading may still be present in the DOM and even visible as a clone. Replace
await expect(firstSlideHeading).not.toBeVisible();with
await expect(
firstSlideHeading.locator('xpath=ancestor::*[contains(@class, "owl-carousel-item")]')
).not.toHaveClass(/active/);🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In generated.test.js around line 64, the test asserts the slide is not visible
which fails when Owl Carousel clones slides; replace the visibility assertion
with a check that the slide's nearest ancestor carousel item does not have the
"active" class. Concretely, locate the ancestor element with a class containing
"owl-carousel-item" for firstSlideHeading and assert it does not have a class
matching /active/ so the test verifies slide inactivity rather than DOM
visibility.
1 participant
This PR was automatically generated by the AI Test Case Generator.
Summary by CodeRabbit