Hook up custom timestamp proc for SD/SDFS #7686
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The SDFS implementation didn't include plumbing to support user-supplied timestamp generators (for file create/write times) because the SDFat library doesn't support a callback parameter. Work around it by using a single, global (inside sdfs namespace) that the static timestamp callback member can see and use. Add a test of the feature in CI. Fixes esp8266#7682
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The SDFS implementation didn't include plumbing to support user-supplied
timestamp generators (for file create/write times) because the SDFat
library doesn't support a callback parameter.
Work around it by using a single, global (inside sdfs namespace) that
the static timestamp callback member can see and use.
Add a test of the feature in CI.
Fixes #7682