Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to canonical eip-X format #2734

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 17, 2020

Conversation

lightclient
Copy link
Member

It appears that the format EIP-X is preferred to EIPX:

$ grep "EIP-[0-9]+" * | wc -l
373

$ grep "EIP[0-9]+" * | wc -l
118

Also note that several of the EIPX references are coming from index.html and EIPS/eip-1.md.

$ grep "EIP[0-9]+" index.html | wc -l
4

$ grep "EIP[0-9]+" EIPS/eip-1.md | wc -l
13

I have updated index.html and eip-1 accordingly.

@lightclient
Copy link
Member Author

lightclient commented Jun 17, 2020

Pinging @Souptacular @axic @nicksavers @Arachnid @gcolvin for review.

@lightclient
Copy link
Member Author

Also see: #2737

@axic
Copy link
Member

axic commented Jun 17, 2020

Copying this from #2737:

This has been discussed in #1464. I see little reason having a meta issue, rather than adding this into EIP-1 itself.

This is rather confusing to have two PRs. I suggest to close #2737 and merge this.

@lightclient
Copy link
Member Author

I have added the style guide to EIP-1 itself. Please review the copy and let me know if it is acceptable. A potential next task is to comb through the repo and expunge all EIPX references and replace them with EIP-X. I'd be happy to do this if desired.

@MicahZoltu
Copy link
Contributor

I didn't read any dissent in the meeting, and some agreement, with the only real strongly held (from the wording) opinion being that we should pick a standard and go with it. We have used EIP-X historically, and that is what this PR proposes, so I'm going to merge it. We can always change it later if people disagree.

@MicahZoltu MicahZoltu merged commit 9119a4f into ethereum:master Jul 17, 2020
@axic axic mentioned this pull request Aug 28, 2020
2 tasks
tkstanczak pushed a commit to tkstanczak/EIPs that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2020
It appears that the format `EIP-X` is preferred to `EIPX`:

```console
$ grep "EIP-[0-9]+" * | wc -l
373

$ grep "EIP[0-9]+" * | wc -l
118
```

Also note that several of the `EIPX` references are coming from `index.html` and `EIPS/eip-1.md`.

```console
$ grep "EIP[0-9]+" index.html | wc -l
4

$ grep "EIP[0-9]+" EIPS/eip-1.md | wc -l
13
```

I have updated `index.html` and `eip-1` accordingly.
Arachnid pushed a commit to Arachnid/EIPs that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2021
It appears that the format `EIP-X` is preferred to `EIPX`:

```console
$ grep "EIP-[0-9]+" * | wc -l
373

$ grep "EIP[0-9]+" * | wc -l
118
```

Also note that several of the `EIPX` references are coming from `index.html` and `EIPS/eip-1.md`.

```console
$ grep "EIP[0-9]+" index.html | wc -l
4

$ grep "EIP[0-9]+" EIPS/eip-1.md | wc -l
13
```

I have updated `index.html` and `eip-1` accordingly.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants