chore: propose using bytes instead of types #35
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request removes type aliases used for byte slices and updates related struct fields. Changes in Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant B as Batch
participant S as Serializer
participant P as pbseq.Batch
B->>S: Call ToProto() (directly assigns Transactions)
S->>P: Create pbseq.Batch with []byte Transactions
P-->>B: Return serialized Batch
B->>S: Call FromProto() (transactions reassigned directly)
sequenceDiagram
participant C as Client
participant Q as TransactionQueue
C->>Q: AddTransaction(tx []byte)
Q->>Q: Append tx to internal queue ([][]byte)
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
sequencing.go (1)
45-45: Consider adding type aliases for domain-specific byte slices.While using
[]bytedirectly simplifies the type system, it reduces the semantic meaning of these fields. Type aliases likeRollupId,Tx, andHashserved as documentation and helped prevent accidental misuse of byte slices intended for different purposes.Consider keeping the type aliases but making the byte slice nature explicit in the documentation:
+// RollupId represents a unique identifier for a rollup chain as a byte slice +type RollupId = []byte + +// Tx represents a transaction as a byte slice +type Tx = []byte + +// Hash represents a cryptographic hash as a byte slice +type Hash = []byte type Batch struct { - Transactions [][]byte + Transactions []Tx } type SubmitRollupTransactionRequest struct { - RollupId []byte - Tx []byte + RollupId RollupId + Tx Tx }Also applies to: 50-51, 60-61, 73-74
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
sequencing.go(3 hunks)serialization.go(1 hunks)test/dummy.go(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
serialization.go (1)
11-11: LGTM! Simplified serialization logic.The removal of conversion functions and direct assignment of byte slices simplifies the code while maintaining type safety. This change also improves performance by avoiding unnecessary conversions.
Also applies to: 16-16
test/dummy.go (1)
22-22: LGTM! Consistent type usage across test code.The changes in the test implementation correctly align with the core changes, maintaining consistency in how transactions are represented across the codebase.
Also applies to: 29-29, 34-34
Manav-Aggarwal
requested review from
facundomedica,
tuxcanfly,
tzdybal,
yarikbratashchuk,
gupadhyaya and
a team
This pr proposes using bytes instead of types that are just aliased.
Summary by CodeRabbit