Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rna-transcription: don't transcribe both ways #11

Closed
kytrinyx opened this issue Apr 7, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

rna-transcription: don't transcribe both ways #11

kytrinyx opened this issue Apr 7, 2016 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@kytrinyx
Copy link
Member

kytrinyx commented Apr 7, 2016

I can't remember the history of this, but we ended up with a weird non-biological thing in the RNA transcription exercise, where some test suites also have tests for transcribing from RNA back to DNA. This makes no sense.

If this track does have tests for the reverse transcription, we should remove them, and also simplify the reference solution to match.

If this track doesn't have any tests for RNA->DNA transcription, then this issue can be closed.

See exercism/problem-specifications#148

@chezwicker
Copy link
Contributor

I always thought this made sense from the programming side even if it's nonsense in terms of biology: it makes sure the solution doesn't hard code values but abstracts by e.g. defining source -> target "maps" that can be passed to the algo used.

I would value this more than consistency with reality. Maybe we could rephrase and state that sometimes we find isolated RNA and want to know what DNA strand it resulted from...

On 7 Apr 2016, at 03:58, Katrina Owen notifications@github.com wrote:

I can't remember the history of this, but we ended up with a weird non-biological thing in the RNA transcription exercise, where some test suites also have tests for transcribing from RNA back to DNA. This makes no sense.

If this track does have tests for the reverse transcription, we should remove them, and also simplify the reference solution to match.

If this track doesn't have any tests for RNA->DNA transcription, then this issue can be closed.

See exercism/problem-specifications#148


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub

@kytrinyx
Copy link
Member Author

kytrinyx commented Apr 7, 2016

Yeah, rephrasing it would work. I don't have a strong opinion. I didn't think about the fact that reversing it would avoid hard-coding, that's a good reason to keep the reverse algorithm. Would you mind making that point in the original/top-level thread?

@chezwicker
Copy link
Contributor

Sure, will do!

@kytrinyx
Copy link
Member Author

When you decide to update the description, then go ahead and copy the description.md file from problem-specifications to exercises/rna-transcription/.meta/description.md and update it here. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants