Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin to v6 #287

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2021

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Nov 6, 2020

WhiteSource Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin ^5.2.1 -> ^6.0.8 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

TypeStrong/fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin

v6.0.8

Compare Source

v6.0.7

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v6.0.6

Compare Source

v6.0.5

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • use external store for files change to not rely on wfs (#​546) (2f330b5)

v6.0.4

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v6.0.3

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v6.0.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v6.0.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v6.0.0

Compare Source

Features
  • add support for "generateTrace" tsconfig option (#​523) (e90c7e4)
  • use webpack's built-in watching instead of polling (fb22e47)
BREAKING CHANGES
  • 🧨 Remove issue.scope option and use new watch architecture

Renovate configuration

📅 Schedule: At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻️ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by WhiteSource Renovate. View repository job log here.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 6, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #287 (8b88567) into development (03da98c) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           development     #287   +/-   ##
============================================
  Coverage        96.17%   96.17%           
============================================
  Files               46       46           
  Lines             1387     1387           
  Branches           295      313   +18     
============================================
  Hits              1334     1334           
  Misses               7        7           
  Partials            46       46           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 03da98c...8b88567. Read the comment docs.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin-6.x branch 2 times, most recently from 2a83814 to 9931816 Compare November 15, 2020 16:09
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin-6.x branch from 9931816 to 444d4d4 Compare November 17, 2020 17:38
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin-6.x branch from 444d4d4 to 76e4c23 Compare November 26, 2020 22:30
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin-6.x branch 2 times, most recently from f8b1f8e to 535e712 Compare December 6, 2020 16:26
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin-6.x branch 2 times, most recently from 8047ace to 86cadf3 Compare December 15, 2020 10:12
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin-6.x branch from 86cadf3 to 3e0f359 Compare December 20, 2020 18:32
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin-6.x branch from 3e0f359 to 8b88567 Compare January 5, 2021 08:18
@exreplay exreplay merged commit 4a0377d into development Jan 5, 2021
@exreplay exreplay deleted the renovate/fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin-6.x branch January 5, 2021 09:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants